🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the Britain, and it feels like it’s time for a rethink. Over the years, an observance that was initiated as a celebration and reminder of the past, cultural identity and bonds between Black populations worldwide, has developed a corporate feel, growing to encompass functions where individuals of African heritage are paid to address white audiences about implicit prejudice and active solidarity. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests sparked an increase in the industry of displaying cultural sensitivity. However, that period has concluded. The tide has reached its height, producing a diluted aftermath of what raising awareness is for.

The History of Black History Month

First commemorated in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of commemoration and observance in the February's second week. Black History Month grew out of this campaign and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the United States and Canada in the second month, but also in October in the UK, Germany, Éire and the Holland.

The period has transformed since those days, giving reduced attention to the histories of colonial slavery and struggles for equality, and more on influential individuals of color in government, the arts, and social movements, and broadly celebrating the input Black people have made to mold society. It is in schools where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with lectures and artistic activities. But the manner the observance is observed is a manifestation of the political moment. How it evolves is a instructive case in how appropriation leads to erosion: the transformation of Black History Month has hindered the purpose of it, which is to confront structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Jarring Moment

Hardly anything shows how crucial it is to reevaluate Black History Month better than the specific period in which it takes place this year. In the United Kingdom, a reemerging right-wing in the shape of the Reform organization is top in opinion ratings. In the warmer months we witnessed the largest far-right rally in the UK's past. a prominent political figure, the Black leader of the Conservative party, is a staunch adversary of the racial justice movement, and we are in a place where a elected representative feels empowered to state that the absence of Caucasian individuals in specific city neighborhoods is a reason for concern. Meanwhile, ultra-nationalist movements are growing in the EU as a complete entity.

In the US, a massive attack against DEI and affirmative action has been brought, often successfully, to the top legal institutions of the country. A effort to scrub African American heritage and legacy from the historical documents is in progress. One of the former president's first executive orders focused on the museum of African American legacy, and the Smithsonian Institution, accusing them of a coordinated and broad attempt to alter the country's historical narrative” by portraying America “as naturally discriminatory”.

Against this backdrop, the month illustrates how minimally it can be impactful if it is confined to either obligatory business commemorations, or politically neutered festivities of historical achievements, rather than challenging the realities of the current era. It also shows how its limited duration means that it is separated from the broader ongoing work that is required. An academic expert, a prof at a learning establishment, articulated it most accurately when she raised concerns about the short-term symbolic gestures of the month. “The problem with embracing a superficial method”, she wrote, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month evolves into a transient display rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Establishing how to adapt, revise and extend initiatives for equal rights and acknowledgment in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a difficult task. There is a urge to just eliminate observances such as Black History Month completely, thinking they are no longer suitable, or are remnants of an period that has failed to deliver.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and heritage of racial movements – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and yes, even those talks to businesses – represent an framework that a lot of work has been invested in. It is there not just to decay as the situation evolves (and in fact, declines), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month look like? To begin with, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is distributed across all seasons (as various establishments are already commencing), sections of its curriculum (particularly around historic Black characters) integrated into academic syllabi. It would also be a time that does not evade governmental matters, and allows opportunity for people, particularly young people, to share their anxieties and narratives. What purpose serves simple recognition of the past when it ignores the current situation of extreme conservative demonstrations in the street? Establishments who celebrate it should not be pacified with the non-confrontational words of implicit prejudice and alertness to minor insults, but challenged by the dangers that face all if fight against prejudice is not approached earnestly. In short, Black History Month should be made current, urgent, and adaptive. It could be that an total re-identification is in order – Contemporary Black History Month.