Families' Distress Regarding Coastal Degradation Endangering Norfolk Graves
Loved ones of people laid to rest in graves at risk from shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision over how to address the problem is creating unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.
A Looming Danger to Historic Graveyards
The council have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the coming decades.
A newly published study on the issue details a range of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure sites. Authorities say it is for local people to determine how to proceed.
“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents intended this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”
Projections suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.
Haunted by the Past
One resident recalled a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, including its church and graveyard.
“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. People will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing looking for treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”
“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”
A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy
Along the coast is situated the grave of a former paratrooper killed while serving abroad. His mother said she could not sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be moved.
“It truly disturb me to think this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”
She believes, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”
Searching for Solutions and Clarity
The lack of consensus over when and how to handle the problem has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.
Some are calling for more sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to continue for now. Others argue the time for moving graves is drawing near.
“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”
A local official said the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with communities.”
It was also stated there was time to consider all the choices. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”
“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires good community discussions to discover the right answers for each community.”
The prospect of losing the historic sites was described as one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, providing a theological viewpoint on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.